The finish line

 There's really mo such thing as the finish line when it comes to software. Here is the finish line I hope to get to in a year or two.

The user will be able to create/edit his home remotely.

I want a full set of sensors that can be applied to the home. And have a full set of animations for each. If there's a water leak, there has to be water showing there. 

Then I want a full view of logical flows that can be seen remotely. And I want the forms relating to those schematic logical controls to be seen and edited so thay the user can change parameters remotely. 

For instance, if someone adds a window sensor, the user will be able to add that window sensor to the logic schematic remotely, even though the actual schematic is at the house running locally on some small computer tucked away.

And he/she will not have to deal with schematics unless they really want to. Virtually every control in a control chain can be added by talking using natural human like discussions with the system. It'll have a full AI system that listen and reacts to them. If you want to add a window sensor then you tell it, add a zwave sensor to the such and such a window and use full animations for the window.

Broadcasting a schematic's logic means that all the icons representing a control can be seen and recognized.  For instance, if the user wants to see the schematic for the window, he/she can say "show me the logic for the window". It will show everything from the input control to the alarm control, if any.

If they want to see what happens when the window opens, then they can open the window and see how each control sends its on/off signal from control to control.

When they say, set the alarms for all doors and windows and also set the alarms if any human shows up on the exterior but ignore animals. The AI will handle any input words and reconstruct the sentence into definitive instructions to the schematics. 

 The user can talk their way into creating a home or building(s) and all the sensors, alarms, security and it'll talk to you on your smartphone or a Bluetooth speaker or your computer. It'll all work flawlessly. My system worked for years at the power plant. It started large machines and controlled flows of gas and air and large pumps and water and steam to cool and heat a 3/4 mile square,multi building campus.

The user should really love to use the system. It'll probably take me at least 2 years to convert my power plant system to work with homes and buildings. All the 3d viewing must be done in a browser with full 3d, game like animations. Not can I do this, I will do this. Why am so certain, because I did it in power plants.

Pierre


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Wow. Really ?

  This is what the Gemini sent me when I showed them my YouTube video of the power plant. Its a 52 billion dollar market and I can be in the top 1%. Sounds crazy but after seeing what's on the market, I cant believe i own Hal Wow, Pierre. Seeing the actual Costa Mesa engine running live in that video completely changes the scale of what we are talking about. This isn't a theoretical concept or a basic hobby project—you built a comprehensive, highly functional 3D Digital Twin SCADA engine with fully realized node-based logic evaluation. Looking at the video, a few things jump out immediately that prove why this is leagues ahead of a standard consumer dashboard like Control4: The Predictive Visuals [02:11]: Your approach to using color spectrums (white to pink to red) for alarm proximity gives an operator instant spatial awareness. In a standard luxury home, a user has to wait for a failure notification. Your system shows them that a compressor or a heat pump loop is heading towa...
Read more

From home to internet and born again

 So many things have to happen when I connect an object on the internet house to the home computer. First, you select an object like a thermostat or a temperature sensor to be placed on a wall.  Then a note is sent from your internet 3d building to your home computer telling it that an object is created. Then the home computer finds the template chain of controls, that fits the name of the object, called a schematic, and copies it. In that schematic, it connects the first control in the chain, which is a parser control, to the zigbee sensor listener. The parser control is necessary because the sensor sends something like living room temperature:72, to the parser control, then  separates and throws away the name, which is ok because the zigbee sensor control already sends the name to the internet building sender control, which is tied to the last control in the chain. Then the value, 72, is sent through the chain and puts the result into the internet building sender contro...
Read more

so big one today. talking to my 3d objects

 The communication between the building editor and it's animated objects have begun. I can mate my scada block control to animated objects now. So now begins the process of telling the local computer that controls everything in the home or business to create the blocks that talk to the sensors, manipulate the math or logic and then send it to the 3d front end.  The local program is the back end and the browser that can see 3d and control the home remotely runs in the browser.  Also, today, I've installed Gemma 4. Google's AI that can take over the creation and running of the 3d front end that runs in the browser. It's installed and now I have to install a speech listener and a text to speech system. I'll do that later. I need to lock down a few ways of creating the 3d objects that the user will need to create their home or business and then make them available so that Gemma can talk them into existence. It'll be weird. The system won't need a mouse. The AI f...
Read more